IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 57% cheaper per million tokens than Pixtral-12B. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is $0.02 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens versus Pixtral-12B at $0.15 / $0.15. Sources: https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Better value

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

    IBM

    $0.13blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.11

    131K ctx|Open Source
    57%
    cheaper

    Pixtral-12B

    Mistral

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.15

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.17 per million tokens by choosing IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview over Pixtral-12B.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewPixtral-12B

    Score vs price

    IFEval. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceIBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewPixtral-12B
    Metric
    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
    Pixtral-12B
    Provider
    Provider
    IBM
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-05-02
    2024-09-17
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-89%
    $0.02
    $0.15
    Output Price-25%
    $0.11
    $0.15
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.13
    $0.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    8.2K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    0.1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    63%
    61.3%
    60.4%
    69.2%
    52.5%
    82.4%
    72%
    48.1%
    26.7%
    86.1%
    81.8%
    90.7%
    46.2%
    70.1%
    58%
    52.7%
    60.5%
    76.8%
    22.9%
    58.1%
    78.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview 2|1 Pixtral-12B

    Verdict

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B: the bottom line

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Pixtral-12B?

    As of August 30, 2026, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 57% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens ($0.13 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Pixtral-12B costs $0.15 / $0.15 per million tokens ($0.30 blended). Sources: https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B cost per million tokens?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview OpenRouter API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.11 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Pixtral-12B Mistral API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.15 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Pixtral-12B?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads on HumanEval: IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview at 82.4% vs Pixtral-12B at 72%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports a 131K token context window, while Pixtral-12B supports 128K tokens. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Pixtral-12B?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Pixtral-12B's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Pixtral-12B better for production use?

    Both IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Pixtral-12B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Pixtral-12B in my app?

    Yes. Call IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview through OpenRouter and Pixtral-12B through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenRouter API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Pixtral-12B?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Pixtral-12B supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Pixtral-12B?

    Pixtral-12B has a measured throughput of approximately 0.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Pixtral-12B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Pixtral-12B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview costs $0.02/M input and $0.11/M output via OpenRouter. Pixtral-12B costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.