Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3.5-9B is 32% cheaper per million tokens than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is $0.07 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.5-9B at $0.10 / $0.15. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

    Google

    $0.37blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.07

    Output

    $0.30

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    32%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3.5-9B

    Qwen

    $0.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.15

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.12 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3.5-9B over Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen3.5-9B

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen3.5-9B
    Metric
    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
    Qwen3.5-9B
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-03-15
    2026-03-02
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-30%
    $0.07
    $0.10
    Output Price+100%
    $0.30
    $0.15
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.37
    $0.25
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    8.2K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-10-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    150 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    38.4%
    81.7%
    27.6%
    91.5%
    64.5%
    63%
    81.2%
    77.2%
    53.7%
    87.1%
    74.4%
    58.7%
    66.1%
    88.2%
    0.3%
    86.4%
    83.2%
    32.8%
    83.2%
    82.9%
    75.6%
    55.2%
    54.7%
    83.4%
    58.7%
    82.5%
    76.3%
    91.1%
    54.7%
    75.5%
    55.9%
    57.3%
    58.2%
    79.1%
    40.9%
    66.2%
    29.8%
    72.6%
    72.6%
    92.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B 0|2 Qwen3.5-9B

    Verdict

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B: the bottom line

    Qwen3.5-9B offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen3.5-9B?

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3.5-9B is 32% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens ($0.25 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs $0.07 / $0.30 per million tokens ($0.37 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B cost per million tokens?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Gemini API pricing is $0.07 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Google. Qwen3.5-9B OpenRouter API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.15 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen3.5-9B?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a published HumanEval score of 74.4%. Qwen3.5-9B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3.5-9B supports 262K tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen3.5-9B?

    Qwen3.5-9B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen3.5-9B better for production use?

    Both Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen3.5-9B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3.5-9B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen3.5-9B in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B through Google and Qwen3.5-9B through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen3.5-9B?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports up to 8K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.5-9B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen3.5-9B?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a measured throughput of approximately 150 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3.5-9B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen3.5-9B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B costs $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output. Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.10/M input and $0.15/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.