Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 71% cheaper per million tokens than MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Llama 4 Scout is $0.08 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens versus MiMo-V2.5-Pro at $0.43 / $0.87. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Better value

    Llama 4 Scout

    Meta

    $0.38blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.08

    Output

    $0.30

    10M ctx|Open Source
    71%
    cheaper

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Xiaomi

    $1.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.43

    Output

    $0.87

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.92 per million tokens by choosing Llama 4 Scout over MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

    Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    MATH. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2.5-Pro
    Metric
    Llama 4 Scout
    MiMo-V2.5-Pro
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Xiaomi
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-05
    2026-04-27
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-82%
    $0.08
    $0.43
    Output Price-66%
    $0.30
    $0.87
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.38
    $1.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    10M
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    10M
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    76.1 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    34%
    57.2%
    66.7%
    57.2%
    82.6%
    19.5%
    32.8%
    81.3%
    17.0%
    50.2%
    79.6%
    89.4%
    69.4%
    89.8%
    75.6%
    50.3%
    86.2%
    37.3%
    97.2%
    88.4%
    91.5%
    88.8%
    64%
    90.2%
    61.4%
    0%
    4%
    94.4%
    86.3%
    55.2%
    83.6%
    99.6%
    70.7%
    67.8%
    74.1%
    32.5%
    83.7%
    90.6%
    74.3%
    68.5%
    92.8%
    72.9%
    73.8%
    81.3%
    31.5%
    85.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 4 Scout 1|8 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Verdict

    Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: the bottom line

    Llama 4 Scout offers significantly lower pricing, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 71% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens ($0.38 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43 / $0.87 per million tokens ($1.30 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro cost per million tokens?

    Llama 4 Scout Meta API pricing is $0.08 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Meta. MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi API pricing is $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens via Xiaomi. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Scout or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 78.9%. Llama 4 Scout does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    Llama 4 Scout supports a 10M token context window, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on 8 of 9 shared benchmarks versus Llama 4 Scout's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 4 Scout or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for production use?

    Both Llama 4 Scout and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 4 Scout has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 4 Scout and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 4 Scout through Meta and MiMo-V2.5-Pro through Xiaomi with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and Xiaomi API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 4 Scout and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    Llama 4 Scout supports up to 10M output tokens per request, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 4 Scout or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    Llama 4 Scout has a measured throughput of approximately 76.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiMo-V2.5-Pro is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 4 Scout or MiMo-V2.5-Pro from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.