K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, MiniMax M3 is 6% cheaper per million tokens than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is $0.60 / $1.00 per million input/output tokens versus MiniMax M3 at $0.30 / $1.20. Source: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Source: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

    LG AI Research

    $1.60blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.60

    Output

    $1.00

    32.8K ctx|Proprietary
    6%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MiniMax M3

    MiniMax

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.10 per million tokens by choosing MiniMax M3 over K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23BMiniMax M3

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceK-EXAONE-236B-A23BMiniMax M3
    Metric
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
    MiniMax M3
    Provider
    Provider
    LG AI Research
    MiniMax
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-12-31
    2026-06-01
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+100%
    $0.60
    $0.30
    Output Price-17%
    $1.00
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.60
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32.8K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    32.8K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-10-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    50 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    90.9%
    20.4%
    45.4%
    83.5%
    67.3%
    74.2%
    78.1%
    85.7%
    92.8%
    71.1%
    81.2%
    27.7%
    20.5%
    74.5%
    68.1%
    3.7%
    76.3%
    73.2%
    47.8%
    14.7%
    83.3%
    70.0%
    40.2%
    46.3%
    87.3%
    83.8%
    84.2%
    42.1%
    45.1%
    52.6%
    50.6%
    45.8%
    51.5%
    63.7%
    73.2%
    72.7%
    85.7%
    50.1%
    85.4%
    84.6%
    2100000
    Benchmark Wins
    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B 1|1 MiniMax M3

    Verdict

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. MiniMax M3 has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M3?

    As of August 25, 2026, MiniMax M3 is 6% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60 / $1.00 per million tokens ($1.60 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3 cost per million tokens?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B LG AI Research API pricing is $0.60 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via LG AI Research. MiniMax M3 MiniMax API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via MiniMax. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M3?

    MiniMax M3 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 80.5%. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports a 33K token context window, while MiniMax M3 supports 1M tokens. MiniMax M3 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M3?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and MiniMax M3 are tied across 2 shared benchmarks. Check the table for category-level strengths. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M3 better for production use?

    Both K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and MiniMax M3 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiniMax M3 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and MiniMax M3 in my app?

    Yes. Call K-EXAONE-236B-A23B through LG AI Research and MiniMax M3 through MiniMax with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published LG AI Research API pricing and MiniMax API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and MiniMax M3?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports up to 33K output tokens per request, while MiniMax M3 supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M3?

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has a measured throughput of approximately 50 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiniMax M3 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or MiniMax M3 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs MiniMax M3 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B costs $0.60/M input and $1.00/M output. MiniMax M3 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    0 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.