Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 3 4B is 99% cheaper per million tokens than Mistral Medium 3.5. Gemma 3 4B is $0.02 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral Medium 3.5 at $1.50 / $7.50. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Better value

    Gemma 3 4B

    Google

    $0.06blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.04

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    99%
    cheaper

    Mistral Medium 3.5

    Mistral

    $9.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.50

    Output

    $7.50

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $8.94 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 3 4B over Mistral Medium 3.5.

    Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemma 3 4BMistral Medium 3.5

    Score vs price

    MMLU-Pro. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 3 4BMistral Medium 3.5
    Metric
    Gemma 3 4B
    Mistral Medium 3.5
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-03-12
    2026-04-29
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-99%
    $0.02
    $1.50
    Output Price-99%
    $0.04
    $7.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.06
    $9.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-08-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    33 tok/s
    1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    30.8%
    34.9%
    39.6%
    48.6%
    90.2%
    69%
    86.3%
    19.6%
    71.3%
    75.6%
    74.8%
    66.9%
    36.3%
    68.8%
    95.8%
    58.8%
    0%
    75.8%
    4.6%
    11.2%
    89.2%
    50%
    63.2%
    33.8%
    67.7%
    43.6%
    75.3%
    48.8%
    70.3%
    37.6%
    13.4%
    76.1%
    91.4%
    68.0%
    57.8%
    62.4%
    46.8%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 3 4B 0|1 Mistral Medium 3.5

    Verdict

    Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5: the bottom line

    Gemma 3 4B offers significantly lower pricing, while Mistral Medium 3.5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 3 4B is 99% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens ($0.06 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 / $7.50 per million tokens ($9.00 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 3 4B Gemini API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.04 output per million tokens via Google. Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral API pricing is $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 77.6%. Gemma 3 4B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Gemma 3 4B supports a 131K token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256K tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 3 4B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for production use?

    Both Gemma 3 4B and Mistral Medium 3.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 3 4B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 3 4B and Mistral Medium 3.5 in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 3 4B through Google and Mistral Medium 3.5 through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 3 4B and Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Gemma 3 4B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Gemma 3 4B runs at approximately 33 tokens/second while Mistral Medium 3.5 runs at 1 tokens/second. Gemma 3 4B is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.