Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 33% cheaper per million tokens than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B). Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is $0.50 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct at $0.80 / $1.00. Source: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Source: OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

    NVIDIA

    $2.70blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $2.20

    1M ctx|Open Source
    33%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

    Qwen

    $1.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.80

    Output

    $1.00

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.90 per million tokens by choosing Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct over Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
    Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    NVIDIA
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-06-04
    2025-01-26
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-38%
    $0.50
    $0.80
    Output Price+120%
    $2.20
    $1.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.70
    $1.80
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-09-30
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    37.4%
    87%
    86.1%
    44.6%
    44.4%
    81.7%
    65.4%
    8.8%
    51.1%
    46.7%
    70.2%
    88.4%
    83.2%
    84.8%
    79.8%
    89.5%
    65.5%
    3.1%
    96.4%
    76.2%
    31.7%
    61.9%
    47.3%
    38.1%
    38.6%
    74.6%
    88%
    86.8%
    83%
    70.8%
    76.2%
    70.4%
    88.5%
    78.7%
    56%
    94.7%
    87.1%
    22.6%
    73.1%
    74.8%
    73.5%
    83.7%

    Verdict

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)'s specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 33% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens ($1.80 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs $0.50 / $2.20 per million tokens ($2.70 blended). Sources: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) OpenRouter API pricing is $0.50 input and $2.20 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct OpenRouter API pricing is $0.80 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 70.7%. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Shared benchmark scores for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) through OpenRouter and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenRouter API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Neither Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) nor Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs $0.50/M input and $2.20/M output via OpenRouter. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80/M input and $1.00/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.