Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is 88% cheaper per million tokens than Grok-4.1 Thinking. Grok-4.1 Thinking is $3.00 / $15.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at $0.25 / $2.00. Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: xAI API pricing (https://docs.x.ai/docs/models); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Grok-4.1 Thinking

    xAI

    $18.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $3.00

    Output

    $15.00

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    88%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Qwen

    $2.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.25

    Output

    $2.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $15.75 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3.5-35B-A3B over Grok-4.1 Thinking.

    Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Grok-4.1 ThinkingQwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Score vs price

    Arena Code Elo. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGrok-4.1 ThinkingQwen3.5-35B-A3B
    Metric
    Grok-4.1 Thinking
    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
    Provider
    Provider
    xAI
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-11-17
    2026-02-24
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+1100%
    $3.00
    $0.25
    Output Price+650%
    $15.00
    $2.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $18.00
    $2.25
    Model Details
    Context Window
    256K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    8K
    65K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    80 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    47.4%
    84.2%
    91.9%
    70.2%
    58.5%
    75.1%
    85.2%
    77.5%
    81.4%
    92.6%
    38.4%
    67.3%
    90.2%
    80.7%
    82.2%
    97.8%
    39%
    85%
    79.3%
    64.8%
    34%
    86.6%
    89%
    89.2%
    13.1%
    79.7%
    79.2%
    74.2%
    71.4%
    51%
    83.9%
    86.6%
    61.4%
    85.6%
    91.5%
    85.3%
    81%
    93.3%
    81.9%
    72.3%
    74.8%
    57.1%
    14.6%
    91%
    42.6%
    36%
    62%
    64.4%
    84.1%
    89.2%
    41.4%
    58.3%
    78.7%
    33.4%
    63.4%
    81.2%
    55.5%
    92.7%
    61%
    80.4%
    31.9%
    57.1%
    84%
    76.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    Grok-4.1 Thinking 0|1 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Verdict

    Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: the bottom line

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Grok-4.1 Thinking or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is 88% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens ($2.25 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Grok-4.1 Thinking costs $3.00 / $15.00 per million tokens ($18.00 blended). Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B cost per million tokens?

    Grok-4.1 Thinking xAI API pricing is $3.00 input and $15.00 output per million tokens via xAI. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen API pricing is $0.25 input and $2.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Grok-4.1 Thinking or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 69.2%. Grok-4.1 Thinking does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    Grok-4.1 Thinking supports a 256K token context window, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports 262K tokens. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Grok-4.1 Thinking or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Grok-4.1 Thinking's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Grok-4.1 Thinking or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better for production use?

    Both Grok-4.1 Thinking and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Grok-4.1 Thinking and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B in my app?

    Yes. Call Grok-4.1 Thinking through xAI and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published xAI API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Grok-4.1 Thinking and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    Grok-4.1 Thinking supports up to 8K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports up to 65K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Grok-4.1 Thinking or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    Grok-4.1 Thinking has a measured throughput of approximately 80 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Grok-4.1 Thinking or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Grok-4.1 Thinking vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Grok-4.1 Thinking costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.25/M input and $2.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.