o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is 78% cheaper per million tokens than o3. o3 is $2.00 / $8.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at $0.25 / $2.00. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    o3

    OpenAI

    $10.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $8.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    78%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Qwen

    $2.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.25

    Output

    $2.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $7.75 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3.5-35B-A3B over o3.

    o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceo3Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
    Metric
    o3
    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenAI
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-16
    2026-02-24
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+700%
    $2.00
    $0.25
    Output Price+300%
    $8.00
    $2.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $10.00
    $2.25
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    100K
    65K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-05-31
    N/A
    Throughput
    50 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    14.7%
    47.4%
    83.3%
    84.2%
    80.8%
    49.7%
    61%
    53%
    91.9%
    70.2%
    58.5%
    6.5%
    23%
    76.4%
    75.1%
    85.2%
    78.6%
    77.5%
    30.8%
    15.8%
    86.4%
    91.6%
    94.6%
    63.0%
    82.9%
    81.4%
    97.8%
    92.6%
    17.2%
    88%
    38.4%
    67.3%
    90.2%
    80.7%
    82.2%
    98.4%
    59.7%
    97.8%
    1.4%
    85%
    64%
    64.8%
    86.6%
    89%
    89.2%
    13.1%
    79.7%
    79.2%
    71.4%
    83.9%
    86.8%
    86.6%
    47.3%
    96.1%
    76.7%
    61.4%
    91.8%
    85.6%
    91.5%
    85.6%
    85.3%
    81%
    93.3%
    81.9%
    72.3%
    74.8%
    57.1%
    14.6%
    91%
    42.6%
    36%
    62%
    64.4%
    84.1%
    89.2%
    41.8%
    41.4%
    53.1%
    58.3%
    78.7%
    33.4%
    63.4%
    81.2%
    63%
    74.6%
    55.5%
    92.7%
    83.3%
    80.4%
    31.9%
    57.1%
    76.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    o3 6|6 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Verdict

    o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless o3's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, o3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    As of August 25, 2026, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is 78% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens ($2.25 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). o3 costs $2.00 / $8.00 per million tokens ($10.00 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B cost per million tokens?

    o3 OpenAI API pricing is $2.00 input and $8.00 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen API pricing is $0.25 input and $2.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, o3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads on SWE-bench Verified: o3 at 69.1% vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 69.2%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    o3 supports a 200K token context window, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports 262K tokens. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, o3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    o3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B are tied across 12 shared benchmarks. Check the table for category-level strengths. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is o3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better for production use?

    Both o3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between o3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B in my app?

    Yes. Call o3 through OpenAI and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for o3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    o3 supports up to 100K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports up to 65K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, o3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

    o3 has a measured throughput of approximately 50 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open o3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    o3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. o3 costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.25/M input and $2.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.