Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 71% cheaper per million tokens than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $0.80 / $4.00 per million input/output tokens versus MAI-Code-1.1-Flash at $0.20 / $1.20. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.azure.com

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Microsoft pricing (https://ai.azure.com)

    Claude 3.5 Haiku

    Anthropic

    $4.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.80

    Output

    $4.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    71%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Microsoft

    $1.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $3.40 per million tokens by choosing MAI-Code-1.1-Flash over Claude 3.5 Haiku.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude 3.5 Haiku
    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Microsoft
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2024-10-22
    2026-08-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+300%
    $0.80
    $0.20
    Output Price+233%
    $4.00
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $4.80
    $1.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    200K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    104 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    41.6%
    38.1%
    27.4%
    6.7%
    4.3%
    64.2%
    74.3%
    88.1%
    69.4%
    50.8%
    0%
    83.1%
    43.5%
    85.6%
    65%
    57.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude 3.5 Haiku 0|1 MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Verdict

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash: the bottom line

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is 71% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80 / $4.00 per million tokens ($4.80 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.azure.com. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $0.80 input and $4.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash Microsoft API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude 3.5 Haiku at 40.6% vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash at 72.6%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports a 200K token context window, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Haiku or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Claude 3.5 Haiku's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.5 Haiku and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.5 Haiku through Anthropic and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash through Microsoft with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Microsoft API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.azure.com. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.5 Haiku and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports up to 200K output tokens per request, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.5 Haiku or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku has a measured throughput of approximately 104 tokens/second. Throughput data for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.5 Haiku or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.