Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is 97% cheaper per million tokens than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $3.00 / $15.00 per million input/output tokens versus DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B at $0.13 / $0.40. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet

    Anthropic

    $18.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $3.00

    Output

    $15.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    97%
    cheaper
    Better value

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

    Google

    $0.53blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.13

    Output

    $0.40

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $17.47 per million tokens by choosing DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B over Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Claude 3.5 SonnetDiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceClaude 3.5 SonnetDiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
    Metric
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet
    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Google
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-06-21
    2026-06-10
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+2208%
    $3.00
    $0.13
    Output Price+3650%
    $15.00
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $18.00
    $0.53
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    200K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    April 2024
    2025-01-01
    Throughput
    78 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    11.9%
    59.4%
    73.2%
    54.0%
    54.3%
    81.5%
    6.5%
    90.4%
    68.3%
    92%
    71.1%
    69.1%
    47.6%
    17.5%
    87.1%
    96.4%
    70.5%
    91.6%
    76.1%
    77.6%
    32%
    27.5%
    56.2%
    60%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet 0|2 DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B

    Verdict

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B: the bottom line

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

    As of August 30, 2026, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is 97% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.53 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00 / $15.00 per million tokens ($18.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $3.00 input and $15.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B Gemini API pricing is $0.13 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 49%. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports a 200K token context window, while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B supports 262K tokens. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

    DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.5 Sonnet through Anthropic and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B through Google with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Gemini API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports up to 200K output tokens per request, while DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a measured throughput of approximately 78 tokens/second. Throughput data for DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B costs $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.