DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 79% cheaper per million tokens than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $0.12 / $0.18 per million input/output tokens versus MAI-Code-1.1-Flash at $0.20 / $1.20. Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://ai.azure.com

    Sources: DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing); Microsoft pricing (https://ai.azure.com)

    Better value

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

    DeepSeek

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.12

    Output

    $0.18

    128K ctx|Open Source
    79%
    cheaper

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Microsoft

    $1.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $1.10 per million tokens by choosing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B over MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    DeepSeek
    Microsoft
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-01-20
    2026-08-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-40%
    $0.12
    $0.20
    Output Price-85%
    $0.18
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.30
    $1.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    37 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    62.1%
    83.3%
    94.3%
    45.5%

    Verdict

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 79% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.40 blended). Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://ai.azure.com. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash cost per million tokens?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B DeepSeek API pricing is $0.12 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash Microsoft API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 72.6%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports a 128K token context window, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    Shared benchmark scores for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash better for production use?

    Both DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B through DeepSeek and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash through Microsoft with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published DeepSeek API pricing and Microsoft API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://ai.azure.com. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a measured throughput of approximately 37 tokens/second. Throughput data for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.