DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 84% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Glimmer-30B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $0.12 / $0.18 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Glimmer-30B at $0.35 / $1.50. Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/

    Sources: DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

    Better value

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

    DeepSeek

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.12

    Output

    $0.18

    128K ctx|Open Source
    84%
    cheaper

    Muse Glimmer-30B

    Meta

    $1.85blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.35

    Output

    $1.50

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.55 per million tokens by choosing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B over Muse Glimmer-30B.

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
    Muse Glimmer-30B
    Provider
    Provider
    DeepSeek
    Meta
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-01-20
    2026-08-10
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-66%
    $0.12
    $0.35
    Output Price-88%
    $0.18
    $1.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.30
    $1.85
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2026-01-04
    Throughput
    37 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmark Wins
    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B 0|1 Muse Glimmer-30B

    Verdict

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B: the bottom line

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B offers significantly lower pricing, while Muse Glimmer-30B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 84% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.85 blended). Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B cost per million tokens?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B DeepSeek API pricing is $0.12 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    Muse Glimmer-30B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 76%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports a 128K token context window, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. Muse Glimmer-30B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    Muse Glimmer-30B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Muse Glimmer-30B better for production use?

    Both DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Muse Glimmer-30B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Muse Glimmer-30B in my app?

    Yes. Call DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B through DeepSeek and Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published DeepSeek API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Muse Glimmer-30B?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a measured throughput of approximately 37 tokens/second. Throughput data for Muse Glimmer-30B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Muse Glimmer-30B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.