Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 95% cheaper per million tokens than Grok 4.6. Grok 4.6 is $2.00 / $6.00 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 3.1 70B Instruct at $0.20 / $0.20. Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://llama.meta.com/

    Sources: xAI API pricing (https://docs.x.ai/docs/models); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

    Grok 4.6

    xAI

    $8.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $6.00

    500K ctx|Proprietary
    95%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

    Meta

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $7.60 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.1 70B Instruct over Grok 4.6.

    Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Grok 4.6
    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    xAI
    Meta
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-12
    2024-07-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+900%
    $2.00
    $0.20
    Output Price+2900%
    $6.00
    $0.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $8.00
    $0.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    500K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-02-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    4.687848222704461 tok/s
    42 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    41.7%
    93.2%
    44.2%
    67.5%
    54.4%
    87.5%
    67.1%
    99.2%
    3.6%
    84.8%
    83.6%
    80.5%
    36.7%
    52.6%
    61%
    57.5%
    56.4%
    90%
    2.1%
    94.8%
    66.2%
    79.6%
    62.7%
    61.3%
    58.4%
    95.1%
    15.8%
    68%
    44.7%
    86.5%
    86%
    89.4%
    66.4%
    56.7%
    28.9%
    55.8%
    71.1%
    Benchmark Wins
    Grok 4.6 3|0 Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

    Verdict

    Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: the bottom line

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Grok 4.6 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 95% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens ($0.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 / $6.00 per million tokens ($8.00 blended). Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Grok 4.6 xAI API pricing is $2.00 input and $6.00 output per million tokens via xAI. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Meta API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

    Grok 4.6 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 95.6%. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

    Grok 4.6 supports a 500K token context window, while Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports 128K tokens. Grok 4.6 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

    Grok 4.6 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Grok 4.6 through xAI and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published xAI API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Grok 4.6 and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

    Grok 4.6 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

    Grok 4.6 runs at approximately 4.687848222704461 tokens/second while Llama 3.1 70B Instruct runs at 42 tokens/second. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Grok 4.6 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Grok 4.6 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.