Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 55% cheaper per million tokens than Grok 4.6. Grok 4.6 is $2.00 / $6.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.5-122B-A10B at $0.40 / $3.20. Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: xAI API pricing (https://docs.x.ai/docs/models); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Grok 4.6

    xAI

    $8.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $6.00

    500K ctx|Proprietary
    55%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

    Qwen

    $3.60blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.40

    Output

    $3.20

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $4.40 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3.5-122B-A10B over Grok 4.6.

    Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Grok 4.6
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
    Provider
    Provider
    xAI
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-12
    2026-02-24
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+400%
    $2.00
    $0.40
    Output Price+87%
    $6.00
    $3.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $8.00
    $3.60
    Model Details
    Context Window
    500K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    64K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-02-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    4.687848222704461 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    47.5%
    86.6%
    93.2%
    67.5%
    63.8%
    54.4%
    93.4%
    76.1%
    66.9%
    67.1%
    76.9%
    86.7%
    77.2%
    99.2%
    83.9%
    52.6%
    61%
    93.3%
    57.5%
    56.4%
    2.1%
    40.2%
    72.2%
    91.9%
    81.8%
    85.1%
    66.2%
    85.9%
    62.7%
    62%
    61.3%
    58.4%
    88.4%
    15.8%
    91.4%
    90.3%
    12.7%
    82.8%
    80.8%
    60.2%
    74.4%
    86.2%
    87.9%
    44.7%
    86.5%
    67.3%
    87.3%
    92.8%
    89.4%
    86.7%
    82.2%
    82.9%
    74.7%
    76.6%
    58.6%
    15.4%
    92.1%
    44.5%
    39.5%
    63.3%
    68.9%
    85.1%
    91.3%
    28.9%
    44.1%
    61.7%
    55.8%
    81.6%
    36.2%
    67.1%
    79.5%
    71.1%
    53.2%
    93.2%
    82%
    33.6%
    96.7%
    60.5%
    78.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    Grok 4.6 3|0 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

    Verdict

    Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: the bottom line

    Qwen3.5-122B-A10B offers significantly lower pricing, while Grok 4.6 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 55% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens ($3.60 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 / $6.00 per million tokens ($8.00 blended). Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cost per million tokens?

    Grok 4.6 xAI API pricing is $2.00 input and $6.00 output per million tokens via xAI. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen API pricing is $0.40 input and $3.20 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

    Grok 4.6 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Grok 4.6 at 95.6% vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B at 72%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

    Grok 4.6 supports a 500K token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports 262K tokens. Grok 4.6 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

    Grok 4.6 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better for production use?

    Both Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B in my app?

    Yes. Call Grok 4.6 through xAI and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published xAI API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

    Grok 4.6 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports up to 64K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

    Grok 4.6 has a measured throughput of approximately 4.687848222704461 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Grok 4.6 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Grok 4.6 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.40/M input and $3.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.