Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is 79% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Sonnet 5. Claude Sonnet 5 is $2.00 / $10.00 per million input/output tokens versus Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 at $0.47 / $2.00. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Moonshot AI pricing (https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat)

    Claude Sonnet 5

    Anthropic

    $12.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $10.00

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    79%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

    Moonshot AI

    $2.47blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.47

    Output

    $2.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $9.53 per million tokens by choosing Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 over Claude Sonnet 5.

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Sonnet 5
    Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Moonshot AI
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-06-30
    2025-09-05
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+326%
    $2.00
    $0.47
    Output Price+400%
    $10.00
    $2.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $12.00
    $2.47
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    64K
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    57.4%
    51%
    84.5%
    80.3%
    61.2%
    53.9%
    53.9%
    53.6%
    44.8%
    1544.16
    84.7%
    60.2%
    25%
    80.4%
    47.1%
    81.2%
    74.7%
    88.3%
    80%
    100%
    83.0%
    32.5%
    72.2%
    37.3%
    86.7%
    67.0%
    16.9%
    66.3%
    87%
    38.8%
    81.6%
    97.5%
    47.5%
    76.0%
    87.5%
    84.6%
    94.4%
    59.4%
    48.7%
    48.9%
    56.3%
    60.6%
    46.5%
    75.6%
    79.5%
    73.8%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Sonnet 5 7|1 Kimi K2-Thinking-0905

    Verdict

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905: the bottom line

    Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 offers significantly lower pricing, while Claude Sonnet 5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is 79% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 costs $0.47 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens ($2.47 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 / $10.00 per million tokens ($12.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 cost per million tokens?

    Claude Sonnet 5 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $2.00 input and $10.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 Moonshot AI API pricing is $0.47 input and $2.00 output per million tokens via Moonshot AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

    Claude Sonnet 5 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Sonnet 5 at 85.2% vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 at 71.3%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

    Claude Sonnet 5 supports a 1M token context window, while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 supports 262K tokens. Claude Sonnet 5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

    Claude Sonnet 5 leads on 7 of 8 shared benchmarks versus Kimi K2-Thinking-0905's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 better for production use?

    Both Claude Sonnet 5 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Sonnet 5 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Sonnet 5 through Anthropic and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 through Moonshot AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Moonshot AI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Sonnet 5 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

    Claude Sonnet 5 supports up to 64K output tokens per request, while Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?

    Claude Sonnet 5 has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Sonnet 5 or Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output. Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 costs $0.47/M input and $2.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.