Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 98% cheaper per million tokens than Grok 4.6. Grok 4.6 is $2.00 / $6.00 per million input/output tokens versus MiniCPM-SALA at $0.10 / $0.10. Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://www.openbmb.cn/

    Sources: xAI API pricing (https://docs.x.ai/docs/models); OpenBMB pricing (https://www.openbmb.cn/)

    Grok 4.6

    xAI

    $8.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $6.00

    500K ctx|Proprietary
    98%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MiniCPM-SALA

    OpenBMB

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $7.80 per million tokens by choosing MiniCPM-SALA over Grok 4.6.

    Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGrok 4.6MiniCPM-SALA
    Metric
    Grok 4.6
    MiniCPM-SALA
    Provider
    Provider
    xAI
    OpenBMB
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-12
    2026-02-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+1900%
    $2.00
    $0.10
    Output Price+5900%
    $6.00
    $0.10
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $8.00
    $0.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    500K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-02-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    4.7 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    93.2%
    67.5%
    54.4%
    76.3%
    67.1%
    99.2%
    78.3%
    83.8%
    95.1%
    52.6%
    61%
    57.5%
    56.4%
    2.1%
    81.5%
    81.5%
    66.2%
    62.7%
    61.3%
    58.4%
    15.8%
    89.1%
    44.7%
    86.5%
    89.4%
    67.0%
    23.9%
    54.5%
    43.0%
    86.3%
    89.4%
    81.6%
    87.1%
    92.7%
    28.9%
    55.8%
    71.1%
    Benchmark Wins
    Grok 4.6 2|0 MiniCPM-SALA

    Verdict

    Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA: the bottom line

    MiniCPM-SALA offers significantly lower pricing, while Grok 4.6 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or MiniCPM-SALA?

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 98% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 / $6.00 per million tokens ($8.00 blended). Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://www.openbmb.cn/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA cost per million tokens?

    Grok 4.6 xAI API pricing is $2.00 input and $6.00 output per million tokens via xAI. MiniCPM-SALA OpenBMB API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via OpenBMB. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or MiniCPM-SALA?

    Grok 4.6 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 95.6%. MiniCPM-SALA does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA?

    Grok 4.6 supports a 500K token context window, while MiniCPM-SALA supports 33K tokens. Grok 4.6 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Grok 4.6 or MiniCPM-SALA?

    Grok 4.6 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus MiniCPM-SALA's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Grok 4.6 or MiniCPM-SALA better for production use?

    Both Grok 4.6 and MiniCPM-SALA are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiniCPM-SALA has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Grok 4.6 and MiniCPM-SALA in my app?

    Yes. Call Grok 4.6 through xAI and MiniCPM-SALA through OpenBMB with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published xAI API pricing and OpenBMB API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://www.openbmb.cn/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Grok 4.6 and MiniCPM-SALA?

    Grok 4.6 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while MiniCPM-SALA supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Grok 4.6 or MiniCPM-SALA?

    Grok 4.6 has a measured throughput of approximately 4.7 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiniCPM-SALA is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Grok 4.6 or MiniCPM-SALA from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Grok 4.6 vs MiniCPM-SALA pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Grok 4.6 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    0 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.