Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is 66% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is $0.50 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B at $2.00 / $6.00. Sources: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing

    Sources: OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models); Qwen pricing (https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing)

    Better value

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

    NVIDIA

    $2.70blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $2.20

    1M ctx|Open Source
    66%
    cheaper

    Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

    Qwen

    $8.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $6.00

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $5.30 per million tokens by choosing Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) over Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B.

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
    Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
    Provider
    Provider
    NVIDIA
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-06-04
    2026-08-12
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-75%
    $0.50
    $2.00
    Output Price-63%
    $2.20
    $6.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.70
    $8.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-09-30
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    37.4%
    87%
    86.1%
    44.6%
    44.4%
    81.7%
    65.4%
    46.7%
    84.8%
    65.5%
    3.1%
    31.7%
    61.9%
    38.6%
    86.8%
    83%
    78.7%
    56%
    94.7%
    22.6%
    73.1%
    83.7%

    Verdict

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

    As of August 20, 2026, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is 66% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens ($2.70 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B costs $2.00 / $6.00 per million tokens ($8.00 blended). Sources: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B cost per million tokens?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) OpenRouter API pricing is $0.50 input and $2.20 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B Qwen API pricing is $2.00 input and $6.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 70.7%. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B supports 1M tokens. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

    Shared benchmark scores for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B better for production use?

    Both Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B in my app?

    Yes. Call Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) through OpenRouter and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenRouter API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B?

    Neither Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) nor Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs $0.50/M input and $2.20/M output via OpenRouter. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.