Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.5-27B is 45% cheaper per million tokens than Sakana Namazu. Qwen3.5-27B is $0.30 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens versus Sakana Namazu at $0.95 / $4.00. Sources: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://sakana.ai

    Sources: Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/); Sakana AI pricing (https://sakana.ai)

    Better value

    Qwen3.5-27B

    Qwen

    $2.70blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $2.40

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    45%
    cheaper

    Sakana Namazu

    Sakana AI

    $4.95blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.95

    Output

    $4.00

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $2.25 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3.5-27B over Sakana Namazu.

    Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Qwen3.5-27B
    Sakana Namazu
    Provider
    Provider
    Qwen
    Sakana AI
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-02-24
    2026-08-03
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-68%
    $0.30
    $0.95
    Output Price-40%
    $2.40
    $4.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.70
    $4.95
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    65.5K
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    6.735706278284246 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    48.5%
    85.5%
    95%
    76.5%
    66.1%
    75%
    85.9%
    79.5%
    82.3%
    92.9%
    96.7%
    44.6%
    68.5%
    90.5%
    81%
    80.7%
    97.8%
    87.7%
    60.5%
    87.5%
    92%
    89.8%
    13%
    81.6%
    82%
    60.6%
    73.6%
    88%
    62.4%
    85.9%
    92.6%
    86.1%
    90.3%
    82.2%
    93.2%
    81%
    73.3%
    74.6%
    58.1%
    15.2%
    89.4%
    41.1%
    40.1%
    62.4%
    71.2%
    83.7%
    90.9%
    47.2%
    56%
    80%
    35.4%
    65.6%
    79%
    59.8%
    93.7%
    82.3%
    41.9%
    96.9%
    61.1%
    77.6%
    10%
    Benchmark Wins
    Qwen3.5-27B 0|2 Sakana Namazu

    Verdict

    Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu: the bottom line

    Qwen3.5-27B offers significantly lower pricing, while Sakana Namazu leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Sakana Namazu?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.5-27B is 45% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens ($2.70 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Sakana Namazu costs $0.95 / $4.00 per million tokens ($4.95 blended). Sources: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://sakana.ai. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu cost per million tokens?

    Qwen3.5-27B Qwen API pricing is $0.30 input and $2.40 output per million tokens via Qwen. Sakana Namazu Sakana AI API pricing is $0.95 input and $4.00 output per million tokens via Sakana AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-27B or Sakana Namazu?

    Qwen3.5-27B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 72.4%. Sakana Namazu does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu?

    Qwen3.5-27B supports a 262K token context window, while Sakana Namazu supports 256K tokens. Qwen3.5-27B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Qwen3.5-27B or Sakana Namazu?

    Sakana Namazu leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3.5-27B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Qwen3.5-27B or Sakana Namazu better for production use?

    Both Qwen3.5-27B and Sakana Namazu are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3.5-27B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Qwen3.5-27B and Sakana Namazu in my app?

    Yes. Call Qwen3.5-27B through Qwen and Sakana Namazu through Sakana AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Qwen API pricing and Sakana AI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://sakana.ai. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Qwen3.5-27B and Sakana Namazu?

    Qwen3.5-27B supports up to 66K output tokens per request, while Sakana Namazu supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Qwen3.5-27B or Sakana Namazu?

    Qwen3.5-27B has a measured throughput of approximately 6.735706278284246 tokens/second. Throughput data for Sakana Namazu is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Qwen3.5-27B or Sakana Namazu from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Qwen3.5-27B vs Sakana Namazu pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.30/M input and $2.40/M output. Sakana Namazu costs $0.95/M input and $4.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    0 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.