Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Seed 2.0 Lite is 75% cheaper per million tokens than Mistral Medium 3.5. Mistral Medium 3.5 is $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens versus Seed 2.0 Lite at $0.25 / $2.00. Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://openrouter.ai/bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-lite

    Sources: Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-lite)

    Mistral Medium 3.5

    Mistral

    $9.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.50

    Output

    $7.50

    256K ctx|Open Source
    75%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Seed 2.0 Lite

    ByteDance

    $2.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.25

    Output

    $2.00

    131.1K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $6.75 per million tokens by choosing Seed 2.0 Lite over Mistral Medium 3.5.

    Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Mistral Medium 3.5Seed 2.0 Lite

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceMistral Medium 3.5Seed 2.0 Lite
    Metric
    Mistral Medium 3.5
    Seed 2.0 Lite
    Provider
    Provider
    Mistral
    ByteDance
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-04-29
    2026-02-14
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+500%
    $1.50
    $0.25
    Output Price+275%
    $7.50
    $2.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $9.00
    $2.25
    Model Details
    Context Window
    256K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    256K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2024-01-01
    Throughput
    1 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    85.1%
    34.9%
    39.6%
    48.6%
    69%
    86.3%
    93%
    88.3%
    66.9%
    95.8%
    58.8%
    0%
    11.2%
    33.8%
    67.7%
    75.3%
    37.6%
    13.4%
    76.1%
    91.4%
    68.0%
    Benchmark Wins
    Mistral Medium 3.5 1|1 Seed 2.0 Lite

    Verdict

    Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Seed 2.0 Lite has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Mistral Medium 3.5's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite?

    As of August 30, 2026, Seed 2.0 Lite is 75% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens ($2.25 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 / $7.50 per million tokens ($9.00 blended). Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://openrouter.ai/bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-lite. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite cost per million tokens?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral API pricing is $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Seed 2.0 Lite OpenRouter API pricing is $0.25 input and $2.00 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Mistral Medium 3.5 at 77.6% vs Seed 2.0 Lite at 73.5%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 supports a 256K token context window, while Seed 2.0 Lite supports 131K tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite are tied across 2 shared benchmarks. Check the table for category-level strengths. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite better for production use?

    Both Mistral Medium 3.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Seed 2.0 Lite has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Mistral Medium 3.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite in my app?

    Yes. Call Mistral Medium 3.5 through Mistral AI and Seed 2.0 Lite through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Mistral API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://openrouter.ai/bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-lite. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Seed 2.0 Lite?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 256K output tokens per request, while Seed 2.0 Lite supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 has a measured throughput of approximately 1 tokens/second. Throughput data for Seed 2.0 Lite is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Mistral Medium 3.5 or Seed 2.0 Lite from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Seed 2.0 Lite pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via Mistral AI. Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.25/M input and $2.00/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.