Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 2 27B is 52% cheaper per million tokens than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B). Gemma 2 27B is $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens versus Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) at $0.50 / $2.20. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Better value

    Gemma 2 27B

    Google

    $1.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.65

    Output

    $0.65

    8.2K ctx|Open Source
    52%
    cheaper

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

    NVIDIA

    $2.70blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $2.20

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.40 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 2 27B over Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).

    Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemma 2 27BNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

    Score vs price

    GPQA Diamond. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 2 27BNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
    Metric
    Gemma 2 27B
    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    NVIDIA
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-06-27
    2026-06-04
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+30%
    $0.65
    $0.50
    Output Price-70%
    $0.65
    $2.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.30
    $2.70
    Model Details
    Context Window
    8.2K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2025-09-30
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    37.4%
    87%
    36.5%
    86.1%
    44.6%
    44.4%
    81.7%
    65.4%
    46.7%
    1.4%
    75.2%
    86.4%
    51.8%
    42.3%
    55.1%
    84.8%
    71.4%
    88.6%
    74.9%
    84.8%
    65.5%
    3.1%
    31.7%
    74%
    38.2%
    61.9%
    62.6%
    38.6%
    86.8%
    83%
    78.7%
    83.2%
    56%
    94.7%
    53.7%
    22.6%
    73.1%
    83.7%
    83.7%
    83.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 2 27B 0|1 Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

    Verdict

    Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B): the bottom line

    Gemma 2 27B offers significantly lower pricing, while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 2 27B is 52% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens ($1.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs $0.50 / $2.20 per million tokens ($2.70 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 2 27B Gemini API pricing is $0.65 input and $0.65 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) OpenRouter API pricing is $0.50 input and $2.20 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 2 27B or Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 70.7%. Gemma 2 27B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

    Gemma 2 27B supports a 8K token context window, while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports 1M tokens. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 2 27B or Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

    Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 2 27B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 2 27B or Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) better for production use?

    Both Gemma 2 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 2 27B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 2 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 2 27B through OpenRouter and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 2 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

    Gemma 2 27B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 2 27B or Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)?

    Neither Gemma 2 27B nor Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 2 27B or Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65/M input and $0.65/M output via OpenRouter. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs $0.50/M input and $2.20/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.