Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, LongCat-Flash-Chat is 69% cheaper per million tokens than Claude 3.5 Haiku. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $0.80 / $4.00 per million input/output tokens versus LongCat-Flash-Chat at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Claude 3.5 Haiku

    Anthropic

    $4.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.80

    Output

    $4.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    69%
    cheaper
    Better value

    LongCat-Flash-Chat

    Meituan

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $3.30 per million tokens by choosing LongCat-Flash-Chat over Claude 3.5 Haiku.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceClaude 3.5 HaikuLongCat-Flash-Chat
    Metric
    Claude 3.5 Haiku
    LongCat-Flash-Chat
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Meituan
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-10-22
    2025-08-29
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+167%
    $0.80
    $0.30
    Output Price+233%
    $4.00
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $4.80
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    200K
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    104 tok/s
    100 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    41.6%
    73.2%
    38.1%
    41.9%
    48.0%
    27.4%
    6.7%
    89.7%
    4.3%
    61.3%
    64.2%
    96.4%
    74.3%
    89.7%
    88.1%
    88.4%
    69.4%
    84.3%
    50.8%
    0%
    83.1%
    79.1%
    43.5%
    85.6%
    65%
    82.7%
    57.4%
    89.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude 3.5 Haiku 1|9 LongCat-Flash-Chat

    Verdict

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat: the bottom line

    LongCat-Flash-Chat offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    As of August 25, 2026, LongCat-Flash-Chat is 69% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. LongCat-Flash-Chat costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80 / $4.00 per million tokens ($4.80 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $0.80 input and $4.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. LongCat-Flash-Chat Meituan API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Meituan. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude 3.5 Haiku at 40.6% vs LongCat-Flash-Chat at 60.4%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports a 200K token context window, while LongCat-Flash-Chat supports 128K tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Haiku or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat leads on 9 of 10 shared benchmarks versus Claude 3.5 Haiku's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or LongCat-Flash-Chat better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and LongCat-Flash-Chat are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, LongCat-Flash-Chat has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.5 Haiku and LongCat-Flash-Chat in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.5 Haiku through Anthropic and LongCat-Flash-Chat through Meituan with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Meituan API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.5 Haiku and LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports up to 200K output tokens per request, while LongCat-Flash-Chat supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.5 Haiku or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku runs at approximately 104 tokens/second while LongCat-Flash-Chat runs at 100 tokens/second. Claude 3.5 Haiku is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.5 Haiku or LongCat-Flash-Chat from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs LongCat-Flash-Chat pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output. LongCat-Flash-Chat costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.