LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 13% cheaper per million tokens than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus MiMo-V2.5-Pro at $0.43 / $0.87. Source: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Source: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

    Meituan

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    13%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Xiaomi

    $1.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.43

    Output

    $0.87

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.20 per million tokens by choosing MiMo-V2.5-Pro over LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601.

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601MiMo-V2.5-Pro
    Metric
    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
    MiMo-V2.5-Pro
    Provider
    Provider
    Meituan
    Xiaomi
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-01-14
    2026-04-27
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-31%
    $0.30
    $0.43
    Output Price+38%
    $1.20
    $0.87
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.50
    $1.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    100 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    25.2%
    34%
    80.5%
    66.7%
    82.6%
    19.5%
    82.8%
    81.3%
    50.2%
    56.6%
    99.6%
    89.4%
    89.8%
    75.6%
    86.2%
    37.3%
    97.2%
    88.4%
    91.5%
    64%
    90.2%
    61.4%
    4%
    86.3%
    55.2%
    83.6%
    99.6%
    74.1%
    32.5%
    83.7%
    68.5%
    92.8%
    72.9%
    73.8%
    81.3%
    85.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 2|2 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Verdict

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro FAQ

    Which is cheaper, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    As of August 25, 2026, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 13% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens ($1.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro cost per million tokens?

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 Meituan API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Meituan. MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi API pricing is $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens via Xiaomi. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on SWE-bench Verified: LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 at 70% vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro at 78.9%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports a 128K token context window, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1M tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are tied across 4 shared benchmarks. Check the table for category-level strengths. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for production use?

    Both LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in my app?

    Yes. Call LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 through Meituan and MiMo-V2.5-Pro through Xiaomi with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meituan API pricing and Xiaomi API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 has a measured throughput of approximately 100 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiMo-V2.5-Pro is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.