Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Claude 3.5 Haiku is 47% cheaper per million tokens than Composer 2 Fast. Claude 3.5 Haiku is $0.80 / $4.00 per million input/output tokens versus Composer 2 Fast at $1.50 / $7.50. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Cursor pricing (https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2)

    Better value

    Claude 3.5 Haiku

    Anthropic

    $4.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.80

    Output

    $4.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    47%
    cheaper

    Composer 2 Fast

    Cursor

    $9.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.50

    Output

    $7.50

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $4.20 per million tokens by choosing Claude 3.5 Haiku over Composer 2 Fast.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude 3.5 Haiku
    Composer 2 Fast
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Cursor
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2024-10-22
    2026-03-19
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-47%
    $0.80
    $1.50
    Output Price-47%
    $4.00
    $7.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $4.80
    $9.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    200K
    Max Output Tokens
    200K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    104 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    41.6%
    38.1%
    61.3%
    27.4%
    6.7%
    4.3%
    64.2%
    74.3%
    88.1%
    69.4%
    50.8%
    0%
    83.1%
    43.5%
    85.6%
    65%
    57.4%

    Verdict

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Composer 2 Fast's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Composer 2 Fast?

    As of August 20, 2026, Claude 3.5 Haiku is 47% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens ($4.80 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Composer 2 Fast costs $1.50 / $7.50 per million tokens ($9.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $0.80 input and $4.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Composer 2 Fast Cursor API pricing is $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens via Cursor. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Composer 2 Fast?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 40.6%. Composer 2 Fast does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports a 200K token context window, while Composer 2 Fast supports 200K tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Composer 2 Fast?

    Shared benchmark scores for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Composer 2 Fast are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Composer 2 Fast better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and Composer 2 Fast are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Claude 3.5 Haiku has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Composer 2 Fast in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.5 Haiku through Anthropic and Composer 2 Fast through Cursor with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Cursor API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Composer 2 Fast?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku supports up to 200K output tokens per request, while Composer 2 Fast supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Composer 2 Fast?

    Claude 3.5 Haiku has a measured throughput of approximately 104 tokens/second. Throughput data for Composer 2 Fast is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.5 Haiku or Composer 2 Fast from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Composer 2 Fast pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output. Composer 2 Fast costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Cursor

    1 models

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.