Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or ERNIE 4.5?
As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 38% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.19 per million output tokens ($2.74 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40 / $4.00 per million tokens ($4.40 blended). Sources: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
How much does DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs ERNIE 4.5 cost per million tokens?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 DeepSeek API pricing is $0.55 input and $2.19 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. ERNIE 4.5 Baidu API pricing is $0.40 input and $4.00 output per million tokens via Baidu. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or ERNIE 4.5?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 44.6%. ERNIE 4.5 does not have that eval on this page yet.
What is the context window for DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs ERNIE 4.5?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports a 131K token context window, while ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Which model performs better on benchmarks, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or ERNIE 4.5?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks versus ERNIE 4.5's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Is DeepSeek-R1-0528 or ERNIE 4.5 better for production use?
Both DeepSeek-R1-0528 and ERNIE 4.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DeepSeek-R1-0528 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Can I switch between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and ERNIE 4.5 in my app?
Yes. Call DeepSeek-R1-0528 through DeepSeek and ERNIE 4.5 through Baidu with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
How accurate is this DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs ERNIE 4.5 pricing data?
List rates are the latest published DeepSeek API pricing and Baidu API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
What is the output token limit for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and ERNIE 4.5?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while ERNIE 4.5 supports up to 66K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Which model has better throughput, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or ERNIE 4.5?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 has a measured throughput of approximately 9 tokens/second. Throughput data for ERNIE 4.5 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
How do I switch the models in this DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs ERNIE 4.5 comparison?
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open DeepSeek-R1-0528 or ERNIE 4.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
