Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 98% cheaper per million tokens than Gemini 2.5 Pro. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $1.25 / $10.00 per million input/output tokens versus Ling-3.0-flash at $0.06 / $0.18. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); inclusionAI pricing (https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/)

    Gemini 2.5 Pro

    Google

    $11.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.25

    Output

    $10.00

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    98%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Ling-3.0-flash

    inclusionAI

    $0.24blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.06

    Output

    $0.18

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $11.01 per million tokens by choosing Ling-3.0-flash over Gemini 2.5 Pro.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Gemini 2.5 Pro
    Ling-3.0-flash
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    inclusionAI
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-05-20
    2026-07-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+1983%
    $1.25
    $0.06
    Output Price+5456%
    $10.00
    $0.18
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $11.25
    $0.24
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    65.5K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-01-31
    N/A
    Throughput
    85 tok/s
    1000 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    17.8%
    83%
    86.4%
    42.8%
    50.8%
    4.9%
    59.6%
    89.2%
    23.3%
    14.1%
    82.1%
    83%
    92%
    88.9%
    79.6%
    90.9%
    88.2%
    97.1%
    60.8%
    2%
    17.1%
    50.6%
    73.5%
    93%
    41.9%
    65.6%
    84.8%

    Verdict

    Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Ling-3.0-flash has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Gemini 2.5 Pro's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ling-3.0-flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 98% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens ($0.24 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 / $10.00 per million tokens ($11.25 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash cost per million tokens?

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini API pricing is $1.25 input and $10.00 output per million tokens via Google. Ling-3.0-flash inclusionAI API pricing is $0.06 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via inclusionAI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Gemini 2.5 Pro has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 63.2%. Ling-3.0-flash does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash?

    Gemini 2.5 Pro supports a 1M token context window, while Ling-3.0-flash supports 262K tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Shared benchmark scores for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Ling-3.0-flash are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ling-3.0-flash better for production use?

    Both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Ling-3.0-flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Ling-3.0-flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemini 2.5 Pro and Ling-3.0-flash in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemini 2.5 Pro through Google and Ling-3.0-flash through inclusionAI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and inclusionAI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Ling-3.0-flash?

    Gemini 2.5 Pro supports up to 66K output tokens per request, while Ling-3.0-flash supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ling-3.0-flash?

    Gemini 2.5 Pro runs at approximately 85 tokens/second while Ling-3.0-flash runs at 1000 tokens/second. Ling-3.0-flash is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ling-3.0-flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling-3.0-flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    0 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.