Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 2 27B is 13% cheaper per million tokens than Inkling-Small. Gemma 2 27B is $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens versus Inkling-Small at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Thinking Machines Lab pricing (https://thinkingmachines.ai)

    Better value

    Gemma 2 27B

    Google

    $1.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.65

    Output

    $0.65

    8.2K ctx|Open Source
    13%
    cheaper

    Inkling-Small

    Thinking Machines

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.20 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 2 27B over Inkling-Small.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Gemma 2 27B
    Inkling-Small
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Thinking Machines
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-06-27
    2026-07-30
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+117%
    $0.65
    $0.30
    Output Price-46%
    $0.65
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.30
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    8.2K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    31.6%
    89.5%
    36.5%
    88.5%
    48.7%
    77.4%
    19.5%
    82.2%
    40.1%
    54.4%
    79.6%
    74%
    77.4%
    1.4%
    90%
    75.2%
    86.4%
    51.8%
    42.3%
    30.6%
    55.1%
    95.5%
    84%
    71.4%
    88.6%
    74.9%
    84.8%
    69.6%
    8.3%
    68.8%
    31.8%
    42.3%
    74%
    38.2%
    62.6%
    37.9%
    84.1%
    77%
    85.6%
    83.2%
    32.7%
    33.6%
    53.7%
    15.5%
    75.5%
    83.7%
    83.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 2 27B 0|2 Inkling-Small

    Verdict

    Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small: the bottom line

    Gemma 2 27B offers significantly lower pricing, while Inkling-Small leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Inkling-Small?

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 2 27B is 13% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens ($1.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Inkling-Small costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 2 27B Gemini API pricing is $0.65 input and $0.65 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Thinking Machines Lab. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 2 27B or Inkling-Small?

    Inkling-Small has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 80.2%. Gemma 2 27B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small?

    Gemma 2 27B supports a 8K token context window, while Inkling-Small supports 256K tokens. Inkling-Small offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 2 27B or Inkling-Small?

    Inkling-Small leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 2 27B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 2 27B or Inkling-Small better for production use?

    Both Gemma 2 27B and Inkling-Small are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 2 27B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 2 27B and Inkling-Small in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 2 27B through OpenRouter and Inkling-Small through Thinking Machines Lab with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Thinking Machines Lab API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 2 27B and Inkling-Small?

    Gemma 2 27B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Inkling-Small supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 2 27B or Inkling-Small?

    Neither Gemma 2 27B nor Inkling-Small has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 2 27B or Inkling-Small from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Inkling-Small pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65/M input and $0.65/M output via OpenRouter. Inkling-Small costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via Thinking Machines Lab.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    0 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.