Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Muse Glimmer-30B is 98% cheaper per million tokens than o3-pro. Muse Glimmer-30B is $0.35 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens versus o3-pro at $20.00 / $80.00. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing)

    Better value

    Muse Glimmer-30B

    Meta

    $1.85blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.35

    Output

    $1.50

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    98%
    cheaper

    o3-pro

    OpenAI

    $100.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $20.00

    Output

    $80.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $98.15 per million tokens by choosing Muse Glimmer-30B over o3-pro.

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Muse Glimmer-30B
    o3-pro
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    OpenAI
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-08-10
    2025-06-10
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-98%
    $0.35
    $20.00
    Output Price-98%
    $1.50
    $80.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.85
    $100.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    200K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    100K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-01-04
    2024-05-31
    Throughput
    N/A
    25 tok/s

    Verdict

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Muse Glimmer-30B has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless o3-pro's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer-30B or o3-pro?

    As of August 20, 2026, Muse Glimmer-30B is 98% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens ($1.85 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). o3-pro costs $20.00 / $80.00 per million tokens ($100.00 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro cost per million tokens?

    Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. o3-pro OpenAI API pricing is $20.00 input and $80.00 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Muse Glimmer-30B or o3-pro?

    Muse Glimmer-30B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 76%. o3-pro does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro?

    Muse Glimmer-30B supports a 131K token context window, while o3-pro supports 200K tokens. o3-pro offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Muse Glimmer-30B or o3-pro?

    Shared benchmark scores for Muse Glimmer-30B and o3-pro are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Muse Glimmer-30B or o3-pro better for production use?

    Both Muse Glimmer-30B and o3-pro are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Muse Glimmer-30B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Muse Glimmer-30B and o3-pro in my app?

    Yes. Call Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta and o3-pro through OpenAI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and OpenAI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Muse Glimmer-30B and o3-pro?

    Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while o3-pro supports up to 100K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Muse Glimmer-30B or o3-pro?

    o3-pro has a measured throughput of approximately 25 tokens/second. Throughput data for Muse Glimmer-30B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Muse Glimmer-30B or o3-pro from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs o3-pro pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output. o3-pro costs $20.00/M input and $80.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.