As of August 20, 2026, Step-3.5-Flash is 73% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Glimmer-30B. Muse Glimmer-30B is $0.35 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens versus Step-3.5-Flash at $0.10 / $0.40. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing
Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)
Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Input
$0.35
Output
$1.50
Step-3.5-Flash
StepFun
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.40
Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side
Muse Glimmer-30BStep-3.5-FlashVerdict
Step-3.5-Flash offers significantly lower pricing, while Muse Glimmer-30B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.
As of August 20, 2026, Step-3.5-Flash is 73% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Step-3.5-Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.85 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. Step-3.5-Flash StepFun API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via StepFun. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Muse Glimmer-30B leads on SWE-bench Verified: Muse Glimmer-30B at 76% vs Step-3.5-Flash at 74.4%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.
Muse Glimmer-30B supports a 131K token context window, while Step-3.5-Flash supports 66K tokens. Muse Glimmer-30B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Muse Glimmer-30B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Step-3.5-Flash's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Both Muse Glimmer-30B and Step-3.5-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Step-3.5-Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Yes. Call Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta and Step-3.5-Flash through StepFun with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and StepFun API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Step-3.5-Flash supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Step-3.5-Flash has a measured throughput of approximately 150 tokens/second. Throughput data for Muse Glimmer-30B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Muse Glimmer-30B or Step-3.5-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output. Step-3.5-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output.
Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.
The index
280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
