Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 3% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Glimmer-30B. Muse Glimmer-30B is $0.35 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct at $0.30 / $1.49. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Muse Glimmer-30B

    Meta

    $1.85blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.35

    Output

    $1.50

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    3%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

    Qwen

    $1.79blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.49

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.06 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct over Muse Glimmer-30B.

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Muse Glimmer-30B
    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-10
    2025-09-22
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+17%
    $0.35
    $0.30
    Output Price+1%
    $1.50
    $1.49
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.85
    $1.79
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-01-04
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    22%
    83.5%
    43.6%
    51.9%
    87.8%
    77%
    80%
    66.7%
    75.5%
    74%
    68.1%
    78.8%
    62.1%
    74.7%
    88.8%
    89.7%
    94.7%
    65.1%
    67.7%
    70.7%
    82.2%
    64.8%
    83.4%
    74.6%
    97.1%
    51.3%
    43.3%
    57.4%
    80%
    89.2%
    67.7%
    66.5%
    84.3%
    89.9%
    81.8%
    77.8%
    92.2%
    78.7%
    78.4%
    72.8%
    76.3%
    86.1%
    92%
    48.6%
    79.3%
    95.4%
    44.3%
    60.4%
    23.5%
    74.7%
    85.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Muse Glimmer-30B 3|0 Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

    Verdict

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Muse Glimmer-30B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 3% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.49 per million output tokens ($1.79 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.85 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.49 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

    Muse Glimmer-30B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 76%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

    Muse Glimmer-30B supports a 131K token context window, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

    Muse Glimmer-30B leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

    Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

    Neither Muse Glimmer-30B nor Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.49/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.