Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Sarvam-30B is 73% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is $0.25 / $2.00 per million input/output tokens versus Sarvam-30B at $0.30 / $0.30. Sources: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://www.sarvam.ai/

    Sources: Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/); Sarvam AI pricing (https://www.sarvam.ai/)

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

    Qwen

    $2.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.25

    Output

    $2.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    73%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Sarvam-30B

    Sarvam AI

    $0.60blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $0.30

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.65 per million tokens by choosing Sarvam-30B over Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceQwen3.5-35B-A3BSarvam-30B
    Metric
    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
    Sarvam-30B
    Provider
    Provider
    Qwen
    Sarvam AI
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-02-24
    2026-03-06
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-17%
    $0.25
    $0.30
    Output Price+567%
    $2.00
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.25
    $0.60
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    65K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    47.4%
    84.2%
    66.5%
    61%
    35.5%
    91.9%
    70.2%
    58.5%
    75.1%
    85.2%
    77.5%
    96.7%
    97%
    85.1%
    81.4%
    92.1%
    92.6%
    38.4%
    58.3%
    67.3%
    90.2%
    80.7%
    82.2%
    97.8%
    85%
    64.8%
    86.6%
    89%
    73.3%
    89.2%
    74.2%
    13.1%
    79.7%
    79.2%
    71.4%
    83.9%
    86.6%
    92.7%
    61.4%
    85.6%
    91.5%
    85.3%
    80%
    81%
    93.3%
    81.9%
    72.3%
    74.8%
    57.1%
    14.6%
    91%
    42.6%
    36%
    62%
    64.4%
    84.1%
    89.2%
    41.4%
    58.3%
    78.7%
    33.4%
    63.4%
    81.2%
    55.5%
    92.7%
    80.4%
    31.9%
    57.1%
    76.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7|0 Sarvam-30B

    Verdict

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B: the bottom line

    Sarvam-30B offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Sarvam-30B?

    As of August 30, 2026, Sarvam-30B is 73% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Sarvam-30B costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens ($0.60 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.25 / $2.00 per million tokens ($2.25 blended). Sources: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://www.sarvam.ai/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B cost per million tokens?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen API pricing is $0.25 input and $2.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Sarvam-30B Sarvam AI API pricing is $0.30 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Sarvam AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Sarvam-30B?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads on SWE-bench Verified: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 69.2% vs Sarvam-30B at 34%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports a 262K token context window, while Sarvam-30B supports 33K tokens. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Sarvam-30B?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks versus Sarvam-30B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Sarvam-30B better for production use?

    Both Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Sarvam-30B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Sarvam-30B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Sarvam-30B in my app?

    Yes. Call Qwen3.5-35B-A3B through Qwen and Sarvam-30B through Sarvam AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Qwen API pricing and Sarvam AI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://www.sarvam.ai/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Sarvam-30B?

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports up to 65K output tokens per request, while Sarvam-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Sarvam-30B?

    Neither Qwen3.5-35B-A3B nor Sarvam-30B has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Sarvam-30B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Sarvam-30B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.25/M input and $2.00/M output. Sarvam-30B costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.