MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 50% cheaper per million tokens than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. MiniCPM-SALA is $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base at $0.10 / $0.30. Sources: https://www.openbmb.cn/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: OpenBMB pricing (https://www.openbmb.cn/); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Better value

    MiniCPM-SALA

    OpenBMB

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    50%
    cheaper

    Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Mistral

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.30

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.20 per million tokens by choosing MiniCPM-SALA over Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base.

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    MiniCPM-SALAMistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Score vs price

    MMLU-Pro. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceMiniCPM-SALAMistral Small 3.1 24B Base
    Metric
    MiniCPM-SALA
    Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenBMB
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-02-11
    2025-03-17
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price0%
    $0.10
    $0.10
    Output Price-67%
    $0.10
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $0.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32.8K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    137.1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    37.5%
    76.3%
    78.3%
    83.8%
    81.0%
    59.3%
    95.1%
    81.5%
    81.5%
    89.1%
    67.0%
    56.0%
    23.9%
    54.5%
    43.0%
    86.3%
    89.4%
    81.6%
    87.1%
    92.7%
    80.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    MiniCPM-SALA 1|0 Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

    Verdict

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base: the bottom line

    MiniCPM-SALA offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 50% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs $0.10 / $0.30 per million tokens ($0.40 blended). Sources: https://www.openbmb.cn/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base cost per million tokens?

    MiniCPM-SALA OpenBMB API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via OpenBMB. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base Mistral API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    MiniCPM-SALA has a published HumanEval score of 95.1%. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    MiniCPM-SALA supports a 33K token context window, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports 128K tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    MiniCPM-SALA leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base better for production use?

    Both MiniCPM-SALA and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiniCPM-SALA has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MiniCPM-SALA and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base in my app?

    Yes. Call MiniCPM-SALA through OpenBMB and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenBMB API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://www.openbmb.cn/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MiniCPM-SALA and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    MiniCPM-SALA supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base?

    Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base has a measured throughput of approximately 137.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiniCPM-SALA is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    0 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.