MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 98% cheaper per million tokens than Mistral Medium 3.5. MiniCPM-SALA is $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral Medium 3.5 at $1.50 / $7.50. Sources: https://www.openbmb.cn/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: OpenBMB pricing (https://www.openbmb.cn/); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Better value

    MiniCPM-SALA

    OpenBMB

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    98%
    cheaper

    Mistral Medium 3.5

    Mistral

    $9.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.50

    Output

    $7.50

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $8.80 per million tokens by choosing MiniCPM-SALA over Mistral Medium 3.5.

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    MiniCPM-SALAMistral Medium 3.5

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceMiniCPM-SALAMistral Medium 3.5
    Metric
    MiniCPM-SALA
    Mistral Medium 3.5
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenBMB
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-02-11
    2026-04-29
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-93%
    $0.10
    $1.50
    Output Price-99%
    $0.10
    $7.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $9.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32.8K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    34.9%
    39.6%
    48.6%
    76.3%
    69%
    78.3%
    86.3%
    83.8%
    95.1%
    81.5%
    66.9%
    81.5%
    95.8%
    58.8%
    0%
    11.2%
    89.1%
    33.8%
    67.7%
    67.0%
    75.3%
    23.9%
    54.5%
    43.0%
    86.3%
    89.4%
    81.6%
    87.1%
    92.7%
    37.6%
    13.4%
    76.1%
    91.4%
    68.0%
    Benchmark Wins
    MiniCPM-SALA 0|2 Mistral Medium 3.5

    Verdict

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5: the bottom line

    MiniCPM-SALA offers significantly lower pricing, while Mistral Medium 3.5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 98% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 / $7.50 per million tokens ($9.00 blended). Sources: https://www.openbmb.cn/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5 cost per million tokens?

    MiniCPM-SALA OpenBMB API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via OpenBMB. Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral API pricing is $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 77.6%. MiniCPM-SALA does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5?

    MiniCPM-SALA supports a 33K token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256K tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus MiniCPM-SALA's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for production use?

    Both MiniCPM-SALA and Mistral Medium 3.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiniCPM-SALA has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MiniCPM-SALA and Mistral Medium 3.5 in my app?

    Yes. Call MiniCPM-SALA through OpenBMB and Mistral Medium 3.5 through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenBMB API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://www.openbmb.cn/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MiniCPM-SALA and Mistral Medium 3.5?

    MiniCPM-SALA supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 has a measured throughput of approximately 1 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiniCPM-SALA is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MiniCPM-SALA or Mistral Medium 3.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MiniCPM-SALA vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    0 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.