Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1?
As of August 20, 2026, Inkling-Small is 73% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Inkling-Small costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 / $4.25 per million tokens ($5.50 blended). Sources: https://thinkingmachines.ai and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
How much does Inkling-Small vs Muse Spark 1.1 cost per million tokens?
Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Thinking Machines Lab. Muse Spark 1.1 Meta API pricing is $1.25 input and $4.25 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Which is better for coding, Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Inkling-Small at 80.2% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 82%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.
What is the context window for Inkling-Small vs Muse Spark 1.1?
Inkling-Small supports a 256K token context window, while Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Which model performs better on benchmarks, Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on 21 of 22 shared benchmarks versus Inkling-Small's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Is Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1 better for production use?
Both Inkling-Small and Muse Spark 1.1 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Inkling-Small has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Can I switch between Inkling-Small and Muse Spark 1.1 in my app?
Yes. Call Inkling-Small through Thinking Machines Lab and Muse Spark 1.1 through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
How accurate is this Inkling-Small vs Muse Spark 1.1 pricing data?
List rates are the latest published Thinking Machines Lab API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://thinkingmachines.ai and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
What is the output token limit for Inkling-Small and Muse Spark 1.1?
Inkling-Small supports up to 256K output tokens per request, while Muse Spark 1.1 supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Which model has better throughput, Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 has a measured throughput of approximately 6.152425085592334 tokens/second. Throughput data for Inkling-Small is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
How do I switch the models in this Inkling-Small vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison?
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Inkling-Small or Muse Spark 1.1 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.