Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.5-9B is 83% cheaper per million tokens than Inkling-Small. Inkling-Small is $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.5-9B at $0.10 / $0.15. Sources: https://thinkingmachines.ai and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Thinking Machines Lab pricing (https://thinkingmachines.ai); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Inkling-Small

    Thinking Machines

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Open Source
    83%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3.5-9B

    Qwen

    $0.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.15

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.25 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3.5-9B over Inkling-Small.

    Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Inkling-Small
    Qwen3.5-9B
    Provider
    Provider
    Thinking Machines
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-07-30
    2026-03-02
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+200%
    $0.30
    $0.10
    Output Price+700%
    $1.20
    $0.15
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.50
    $0.25
    Model Details
    Context Window
    256K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    256K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    31.6%
    89.5%
    81.7%
    88.5%
    48.7%
    27.6%
    77.4%
    19.5%
    91.5%
    82.2%
    64.5%
    63%
    40.1%
    54.4%
    79.6%
    74%
    81.2%
    77.4%
    90%
    30.6%
    95.5%
    84%
    66.1%
    88.2%
    69.6%
    8.3%
    0.3%
    68.8%
    31.8%
    42.3%
    83.2%
    83.2%
    82.9%
    75.6%
    55.2%
    83.4%
    37.9%
    84.1%
    77%
    85.6%
    82.5%
    76.3%
    91.1%
    55.9%
    57.3%
    32.7%
    33.6%
    58.2%
    79.1%
    15.5%
    75.5%
    29.8%
    72.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Inkling-Small 5|0 Qwen3.5-9B

    Verdict

    Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B: the bottom line

    Qwen3.5-9B offers significantly lower pricing, while Inkling-Small leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Qwen3.5-9B?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.5-9B is 83% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens ($0.25 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Inkling-Small costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://thinkingmachines.ai and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B cost per million tokens?

    Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Thinking Machines Lab. Qwen3.5-9B OpenRouter API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.15 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Inkling-Small or Qwen3.5-9B?

    Inkling-Small has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 80.2%. Qwen3.5-9B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B?

    Inkling-Small supports a 256K token context window, while Qwen3.5-9B supports 262K tokens. Qwen3.5-9B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Inkling-Small or Qwen3.5-9B?

    Inkling-Small leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3.5-9B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Inkling-Small or Qwen3.5-9B better for production use?

    Both Inkling-Small and Qwen3.5-9B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3.5-9B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Inkling-Small and Qwen3.5-9B in my app?

    Yes. Call Inkling-Small through Thinking Machines Lab and Qwen3.5-9B through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Thinking Machines Lab API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://thinkingmachines.ai and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Inkling-Small and Qwen3.5-9B?

    Inkling-Small supports up to 256K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.5-9B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Inkling-Small or Qwen3.5-9B?

    Neither Inkling-Small nor Qwen3.5-9B has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Inkling-Small or Qwen3.5-9B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Inkling-Small costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via Thinking Machines Lab. Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.10/M input and $0.15/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    0 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.