ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, ERNIE 4.5 is 93% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. ERNIE 4.5 is $0.40 / $4.00 per million input/output tokens versus Gemma 3n E4B Instructed at $20.00 / $40.00. Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

    Sources: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Better value

    ERNIE 4.5

    Baidu

    $4.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.40

    Output

    $4.00

    128K ctx|Proprietary
    93%
    cheaper

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

    Google

    $60.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $20.00

    Output

    $40.00

    32K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $55.60 per million tokens by choosing ERNIE 4.5 over Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

    ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    ERNIE 4.5
    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
    Provider
    Provider
    Baidu
    Google
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-06-25
    2025-06-26
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-98%
    $0.40
    $20.00
    Output Price-90%
    $4.00
    $40.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $4.40
    $60.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    32K
    Max Output Tokens
    65.5K
    32K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2024-06-01
    Throughput
    N/A
    42.09 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    74%
    23.7%
    1.8%
    11.6%
    41.9%
    64.9%
    33%
    25%
    75%
    12.4%
    28.5%
    40.6%
    60.7%
    30.4%
    40.7%
    48.6%
    39.8%
    28.6%
    19%
    60.3%
    25.2%
    37.7%
    57.2%
    40.2%
    63.6%
    67%
    16%
    50.6%
    19.9%
    43.2%
    35.6%
    55.2%
    51.3%
    50.1%
    Benchmark Wins
    ERNIE 4.5 1|4 Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

    Verdict

    ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed: the bottom line

    ERNIE 4.5 offers significantly lower pricing, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed FAQ

    Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

    As of August 20, 2026, ERNIE 4.5 is 93% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens ($4.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00 / $40.00 per million tokens ($60.00 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed cost per million tokens?

    ERNIE 4.5 Baidu API pricing is $0.40 input and $4.00 output per million tokens via Baidu. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed Gemini API pricing is $20.00 input and $40.00 output per million tokens via Google. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a published LiveCodeBench score of 13.2%. ERNIE 4.5 does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

    ERNIE 4.5 supports a 128K token context window, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. ERNIE 4.5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks versus ERNIE 4.5's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is ERNIE 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed better for production use?

    Both ERNIE 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, ERNIE 4.5 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between ERNIE 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in my app?

    Yes. Call ERNIE 4.5 through Baidu and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed through Google with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Baidu API pricing and Gemini API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for ERNIE 4.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

    ERNIE 4.5 supports up to 66K output tokens per request, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports up to 32K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, ERNIE 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a measured throughput of approximately 42.09 tokens/second. Throughput data for ERNIE 4.5 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open ERNIE 4.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    ERNIE 4.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    0 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.